June 25, 2009

Plus 1 to my blogroll

Today I had a wonderful conversation with a Peter Quadagno of Quadagno & Associates, Inc. Peter was generous with his time and shared some of his experiences in the prepaid and payments space. Tons of experience and insight. It turns out Peter has a great looking blog with gobs of great information. Click on the image below and enjoy!

image

 

June 23, 2009

I am a packager

A few weeks back Andy Orrock gave me a crash course in the concepts of the ISO-8583 packager and how interacts with a prepaid authorization host. With a few cartoon like drawings on the whiteboard and it all made sense.

The exercise made me think about the dynamics in play from an business development and account management perspective. Messages go back and forth. Some good, some bad. Messages typically need to be translated, parsed and presented in an understandable and acceptable format.

Some entertaining thoughts (to me at least)

  • Message in = customer yells
  • Unpackage/Translate  = tactfully pass the message along to team
  • Message processed = team yells then settles down
  • Message out = tactfully pass message back to customer
  • Transaction completed = everyone is happy

Not an accurate comparison to an actual payment systems transaction by any means… but the thought made me smile.

I am a packager.

June 11, 2009

Fed Working Paper: Interchange Fees and Payment Card Networks (via PaymentsNews)

Lot's of great (and current) information on the payment systems ecosystem in this Paper:

Motivated by this increased attention to pricing in payment card markets, this
paper discusses and evaluates a number of potential policy interventions for the payment
cards industry, which reflect both actions that authorities in other countries have taken
and proposals that have been advanced by various parties in the United States. These
interventions include:
  • Clarifying or eliminating restrictions on differential retail pricing across payment
  • methods;
  • Prohibiting network determination of interchange fees;
  • Regulating the level of interchange fees;
  • Relaxing card acceptance requirements;
  • Mandating “multi-bugged” cards that can perform transactions on multiple
  • networks with merchant control of network routing rules; and
  • Doing nothing.

Payments News: Fed Working Paper: Interchange Fees and Payment Card Networks - June 10, 2009

Posted using ShareThis

June 03, 2009

If it were easy everyone would be doing it.

Yesterday I attended an implementation meeting for one of our OLS.Switch customers. The customer has selected OLS.Switch as their authorization host for prepaid issuance and is working through enterprise specific discussions with our team as we move closer to launch. During this session, the topic of issuing bank requirements at the extract/reporting level hit the table and we went back and forth on two fronts; 1) technical considerations and 2) business and compliance considerations. Without going into specific details, the customer did not understand the need to deliver several data elements to the issuing bank. After all, if the Third Party Processor (“TPP'”) is responsible for managing end-to-end processing, the bank should just sit back and let the processor decide how to manage the business right? WRONG.

Some thoughts:

  • Gone are the days of easy processor sponsorship and loosely managed pooled accounting. Prepaid has evolved to resemble more traditional bank products complete with a whole new set of governing regulations. (related reading: Big Score for Prepaid... Or Not?)
  • Associations and gateway processors may have different ways of handling the technical aspect of prepaid such as authorization/settlement processing and reporting, but they are still subject to member banks. Member banks are in turn subject to card associations and federal/state banking regulations. This creates a global requirement for member banks to be “in control” of the card program and processor at all times. As a TPP of the issuing bank, providing as many touch-points as possible will empower the bank to represent itself to the bodies it  must answer to in an a complete and accurate manner. (believe me this is what you want)
  • If you think about it, the prepaid TPP has the keys to the kingdom. It’s able to create money out of thin air in the form of a value load and authorize tons of transactions without any real money sitting in the bank. This would soon be caught and shut down but not without some serious losses. Associations and regulators don’t care how capable a processor is. If the bank does not have direct control the risk goes through the roof (perceived and real)
  • The prepaid space battlefield is covered with fallen processors and sponsoring banks. Next to your common business challenges, the lack of understanding and/or appreciation of the sponsoring bank’s role in the ecosystem is a leading cause of death. It doesn’t matter how innovative your platform is. All it takes is one or a few things to happen to spook the people responsible for overseeing the card program and the uphill battle begins… as if running a business doesn’t already have enough hills to climb.

The good news is that immediately after our meeting we went out for Thai food and had a follow up conversation on the importance of supporting the sponsoring bank as it supports the processor business. I think we all agreed that if we can convey to the sponsoring bank partner that everything we do includes protecting the integrity of the program from a regulatory and compliance perspective, we’ll get less pushback when we request out-of-the-box program attributes.

On the way to the car the customer said… “well, if it were easy everyone would be doing it.”

I agreed.

 

June 01, 2009

Finally... a great analysis on prepaid fees

"Results indicate that there is no one financial strategy – whether based on using a traditional checking account, a prepaid card or check cashing services – that is right for all people."

Payments News: How Much Do Prepaid Cardholders Spend Monthly on Fees? - June 01, 2009

Related reading: Prepaid is not for everyone.

Posted using ShareThis

Google Search


Twitter Updates

    follow me on Twitter

    Andy Orrock | Payment Systems

    Payment Systems Blog

    Payment Systems Hardware

    Mobile Banking

    Disclaimer


    • The information in this weblog is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. This weblog does not represent the thoughts, intentions, plans or strategies of my employer. It is solely my opinion. Inappropriate comments will be deleted at the authors discretion.